Understanding Church Charity

During lunch today someone sitting near me was talking about visiting the Vatican. She commented with angst “look at all of the gold on the ceiling, how many poor people could they feed with that?” This instantly reminded me of a comment my dad said years ago. He complained that the church could sell its art work and donate millions to the poor, and that they were hypocritical for not doing so.

It’s easy to tell other people to do with their money, when you have no reason to complain other than your emotional hate for the church. It’s easy to redistribute, to point out how you would spend it if it was your own. And, it’s easy to criticize the Catholic church because you know doing so won’t result in your head being cut off or getting stoned to death.

People continue to battle the church, including the president. His healthcare laws forced the Catholic church to choose between coverage and their morals, then last year he changed his stance (one of his myriad flip flops), and then recent modifications to the law shifted the decision away from churches and put the choices on the insurance companies now. In other words, instead of the faith-based employers or churches paying for contraception coverage, either the insurers or the government will pick it up. So, the same moral dilemma occurs, but now the church just isn’t paying for it.

Remember, the left enjoys attacking the church and loves to point out the horrific atrocities that occurred hundreds of years ago. They love to point out horrible mistakes made by a very small percentage of priests, while at the same time they dare not speak out against radical Islamic practices such as stoning women to death because they were raped (Muslims call that adultery). They ignore how radical Muslims burn homosexuals alive, or regularly beat their women. (Remember, in Islam, women are somewhere between slave and a free person.) Liberals dare not take on the traditional black Baptist population, one that is largely opposed to gay marriage. Instead they pick on the Catholics, an easy target. You know what that sounds like to me? Bullying.

Let’s take a look at just how much the Catholic church helps the world.

  • The Catholic Church was founded long before there were hospitals. Today, nearly one-sixth of all hospital patients in America is taken care of by a Catholic hospital.
  • Catholic hospitals are ahead of other hospitals in a wide range of public health and specialty services traditionally considered “unprofitable.”
  • The Catholic Church teaches 3 million students a day: in its more than 250 Catholic Colleges and Universities, in its more than 1200 Catholic High Schools and its more than 5000 Catholic grade schools.
  • Every day, the Catholic Church feeds, clothes, shelters and educates more people than any other organization in the world.
  • At least ninety-three Catholic Charities adoption agencies can be found online; they are nationwide and have placed thousands of babies into loving homes since the 1920s.

Churches all over the world serve as a refuge to the poor, the needy, and the destitute. Yet in America there exists a rising tide of anti-church hatred, despite all of the good that the church performs. At the same time Americans are being asked to embrace Muslim practices in America, whether it be burqa day at school, or ignoring Muslim honor killings in Texas, or sweeping stories about the New Jersey hate crime of beheading Christians under the rug, or calling the Boston bombers lone wolves, or calling the Fort Hood massacre an incident of workplace violence. Remember, we are not at war with anyone, all of that stuff going overseas is just workplace violence.

So before you consider a liberal anti-church rant, or before you rush to dismiss terrorist activities in America, consider the following. The Catholic church is by far the most giving global charity in both human volunteer time and billions of dollars every year. Meanwhile,

  • Have you ever been tended to in a Muslim hospital?
  • Have you benefited from a Muslim charity?
  • Have you ever seen a Muslim gay pride parade?
  • Have you ever visited a Muslim women’s shelter?

If you think the Catholic church could do a better job with charity, or that it should lose tax-exempt status, check your premise. Then again, if you tend to say these things, you probably believe that the government would do a better job of spending money than the church.

Why are sports teams are so hateful?

Well, it’s apparently time to resurrect the idea that the Washington Redskins team name because it is racist and derogatory. This argument comes up every now and then, and it is defeated every single time. Given the myriad problems our nation is facing, you would think that our politicians could focus on more pressing matters? Nah. That’s like asking local police to focus on capturing criminals instead of pulling citizens over for petty citations that serve the sole purpose of generating revenue for the city.

So, in an effort to help the Washington D.C. council member with this project, I offer the following list of team names that should also be changed, just to keep things fair.

  • Detroit Pistons: How can anyone name their team after a key component of evil carbon-burning machines?
  • Golden State Warriors: Promoting violence, mocking native Americans.
  • Houston Rockets: NASA is dead, and rockets kill people.
  • Miami Heat: Don’t promote global warming!!! Al Roker might blame them for Superstorm Sandy.
  • Philadelphia 76ers: Why promote terrorist revolutionaries?
  • Sacramento Kings: Promotes the 1%. The fix? Change the name to Obamas.
  • Kansas City Chiefs: Obviously hateful, chief.
  • Cleveland Browns: That’s just racist. You might as well call them the Cleveland You People.
  • Oakland Raiders: More violence.
  • Minnesota Vikings: They pillaged and burned. Bad role model.
  • Tampa Bay Buccaneers: More stealing and violence.
  • San Francisco 49ers: Promoting gold-digging evil rich people.
  • Buffalo Sabres: Violent weapon. How many clips does a sabre hold?
  • Carolina Hurricanes: Hateful racist storms caused by man-made global warming.
  • Nashville Predators: Duh.
  • Edmonton Oilers: Bush. Cheney. Halliburton. War. Big Oil. So hateful.
  • Atlanta Braves: Mocking native Americans again.
  • Arizona Diamondbacks: Sounds too close to wetback.
  • San Diego Padres: Separation of church and state.
  • Chicago White Sox: Why’s it gotta be about race?
  • Cleveland Indians: Let’s face it. Even mentioning the term Indian is hateful.
  • Los Angeles Angels: Obviously promoting Heaven. Separation of church and state again. Rename them the LA GLBT’s and you will be just fine.

Our Classless President – Delegation for Chavez, not Thatcher

There are rules of etiquette in the world of national leaders. There are things you and don’t do. Sadly, the past five years have been a living case study in how not to conduct international relations for our president.

Today we learned that Obama has no plans to send an official delegation to former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher’s funeral. Speaker of the House John Boehner had to step up to get this obvious political responsibility properly addressed.

While this might be infuriating on its own merit, the piece de resistance is that our Nobel laureate president felt compelled to send a delegation to the funeral of the America-hating tyrant Hugo Chavez.

Makes perfect sense in our upside down world.

ObamaThatcher

Let me remind the world of just a few of the non-reported gaffes of the worst president in our nation’s history (presented in no particular order). I had to stop at 15… I could double this list quite easily, but I think you get the point.

  1. Obama said it would be so much easier to be the president of China. As one official put it, “No one is scrutinizing Hu Jintao’s words in Tahrir Square.” Maybe because they would be shot for exercising free speech?
  2. Caught on an open microphone. French President Sarkozy: ’I don’t want to see him anymore, he’s a liar.’ President Obama, You’ve had enough of him, but I have to deal with him every day!Stay classy, Mr. President.
  3. Even Mrs. Obama is not immune. Apparently the first lady didn’t listen to her protocol team when visiting the Queen in 2009. You do not touch the queen.
  4. Includes Nazi collaborator/Hitler admirer in proclamation for Jewish American Heritage Month
  5. Declares Polish freedom fighter Lech Walesa “too political” to accept award, gives another to Dolores Huerta, chair of Democratic Socialists of America. Freedom too political, Socialism just dandy.
  6. 2009 Noble Prize winner Obama hosted a state dinner for the Chinese premiere Hu Jintao, the same human rights violating guy that was holding the 2010 Nobel Prize winner Liu Xiaobo under house arrest.
  7. Starts toasting the Queen of England way too early and embarrasses himself in the process. Watch the pain here.
  8. Obama’s crack protocol team strikes again. A dinner to honor leader from South Korea features an all Japanese menu.
  9. Not international, but still disgusting: Sends form letters to families of SEALs killed in action, yet fins time to send a personal letter to family of rapper Heavy D.
  10. No time to meet with Israeli Prime MInister Netanyahu, makes time for the Pimp with a Limp radio show. Seriously?
  11. Three words: “Polish Death Camp.”
  12. Any rational person recognizes that the killing of Bin Laden was a massive military victory. But he was not found by a president or congress, he was found thanks to the efforts of our stellar military carrying out plans launched by President GW Bush and rightfully continued by President Obama. You would think after such a lengthy effort that a president would tip his hat to his predecessor, Nope, not this one. That would be classy. It took a week for the administration to acknowledge the former president, and even that was delivered by an aide, not Obama himself.
  13. Tries to kiss Burmese political leader Aung Sang Suu Kyi
  14. Completely blows the world leader gift exchange with England. Receives antique desk carved from the wood of a slave ship to match the desk that Kennedy had. Gives the queen a DVD box set of top American movies.
  15. Who can forget the blatant ass kissing bow to the Saudi King? World leaders do not bow.

Happy Tax Day – Taxing The Rich Still Won’t Work

For some reason, the president and his supporters believe that the solution to our financial woes is to simply have rich folks like him pay just a little bit more in taxes. They don’t see massive governmental overspending as overspending. And, if you consider the fact that the president expects Americans to think that the impact of a 2% sequester cut will cause mass hysteria, you are also expected to accept the idea that current government spending is just barely enough to keep America going. So how much will raising taxes on individuals?

Take a look at this chart:Taxes3

In 2010, the Federal budget called for $3.6 trillion in spending with the expectation of $2.3 trillion. Of that $2.3 trillion, $950 billion (47%) came from individual income taxes. Within this group the top 10% of earners (people making more than $116k/yr), paid 45% of all personal income tax revenue, totaling $427B.

Let’s put aside for the moment the obvious question of “why does our government need to spend, in one year, $1.3 trillion more than it expects to take in. And, let’s also ignore the fact that this single year of governmental overspending costs more than ten years of those evil Bush “wars that we couldn’t afford.”

Taxes4

The chart above shows that even if we double the tax rate for the top 10% of taxpayers, it would have only a modest effect on the deficit, the gap in spending versus revenue would still be $800 billion. I think it is important to note that even that $800 billion dollar gap after soaking the rich and middle-income Top 10%-ers is still more than twice than that of any previous president, with the single exception of the massive bailout spending authored by Democrat-controlled Congress and signed by lame duck president Bush in his last year.

deficit

Today, Obama’s new budget (his first in four years), calls for spending $3.7 trillion with only $2.4 trillion in revenue expected. Yes, every year this administration has offered trillion dollar deficits. This year it’s a gap of $1.4 trillion. For some perspective, even if we doubled EVERY American’s taxes (from $950B to $1.9T), we would still have a gap of $500B just for this year. And that $500 billion gap is still more than any previous president.

Bottom line, Obama math doesn’t work. We cannot tax our way into prosperity. If you get results from stimulus, the results go away when the stimulus funds run out. We need real economic change, not divisive ideological rhetoric. We need to stop arguing about gay marriage. We need to stop legislating useless anti-gun legislation. We need to start using our brains.

If you think that we can fix our problems by taking more money away from Americans, you are not opening your eyes, you are letting emotions cloud rational thought. There is simply NO way that asking the rich to “pay their fair share” will have any impact on our financial situation.

Gun Talk: We Need Perspective, Not Passion

The year 2012 is being called by some on the Left as “The Year Of The Gun.” Emotions generated by the horrific tragedy at Sandy Hook launched a political frenzy of useless legislative activity. As often is the case, well-intentioned people are willfully ignoring facts and logic in order to get their way. This is also known as Standard Operating Procedure for the Obama administration.

As hard as it is for anti-second amendment people to admit, gun laws do not work. We all agree that the Sandy Hook tragedy is indeed a horrific tragedy. But, none of the 40+ laws Adam Lanza broke prevented it from happening. And if he didn’t have access to the guns his mother legally owned, he would have found guns another way. If laws worked they way many Democrats thought, we could end the suffering of the homeless by making it illegal to be homeless. Prohibition didn’t work. The drug war has been a dismal failure. Creating new gun laws is a waste of time and is dangerously distracting Congress away from dealing with the serious issues facing all Americans today.

Let’s get down to some facts. According to the FBI (using the most recent five years of complete data – 2007-2011)

  • The number of murders in the U.S. has decreased by 15% (from 14,916 to 12,664)
  • The number of firearms murders has decreased by 15% (from 10,129 to 8,583)
  • The number of people killed by handguns in 2011 was 6,220
  • The number of people killed by rifles in 2011 was 323.
  • The number of people killed by shotguns in 2011 was 356.
  • That same year more murders were committed by knives (1,694), hands, fists and feet (728) and blunt weapons such as clubs and hammers (496), than by rifles of any kind.

Despite the information above, Senator Feinstein is carrying out her own assault on our constitutional liberties by trying to pass radical gun restrictions. Her war on scary “assault” rifles is moronic at best. Why? Because as I’ve shown above, murders involving rifles make up less than 3% of all gun-related murders. She, like so many others, is latched onto the emotions of a classroom full of dead children and is unable to think rationally. Consider the following.

Using the same FBI data, about 24 people are murdered by firearms every day in America. Of those 24 victims, 23 were murdered by handguns. (to be fair, they were murdered by bad people using guns, not by the guns themselves). But because 20 children were killed in a school we suddenly need sweeping legislation to ban guns that some people are scared of? Why are politicians focusing on less than 3% of these gun-related deaths? Is it because the kids murdered were all grouped together in an affluent town? Dare I mention that Newtown is 95% white? Why do these victims deserve more attention than the 24 people murdered every day in America, 23 of them shot with handguns?

The president recently said “if there’s even one thing we can do to reduce this violence, if there’s even one life that can be saved, then we’ve got an obligation to try.” Apparently his answer is to focus on a small fraction of the victims because it is easier. He is unwilling to face the reality that his adopted home city is one of the worst in the nation with regard to gun deaths. He is unwilling to face the reality that the public cares more about the second amendment than about Democrats trying to get re-elected. He is unwilling to take on the difficult topics of mental health reform, inner city violence, gang violence, drug violence, and the declining moral values brought about by crumbing families and the profit-focused hypocritical entertainment industry that glamorizes violence and destructive behavior to no end. He would rather find people to blame instead of bring people together.

We have serious cultural issues and economic issues to fix. All of this political time and energy is being wasted on laws that will do NOTHING to solve the problem. Perhaps our politicians should be focusing on things like jobs and the economy instead?

Feinstein’s Victim Parade An Epic Failure

I watched much of the Diane Feinstein gun grabapalooza today and found myself cursing more often than any person should. It was nothing but an emotionally driven power grab based on nothing resembling legitimate data or reality as we know it today. There were so many deceptive statements, so many red herrings and straw men presented, yet I’m sure there were plenty of Americans clapping and cheering every time a Democrat said the word “children” or asserted that we “had to do something now.” Truly pathetic.

As the cherry on the top of this shameful crap sundae, a handful of victims were paraded to the podium to share their stories and help prove that Diane Feinstein and her supporters truly have the best interests of Americans on their mind.

Below are the people and their stories based on their brief commentary on C-SPAN today. (Click here to view the video of this portion of the broadcast)  Remember that the goal of this “Assault Weapons Ban Bill” circus is to prevent future tragedies by making it harder or impossible to buy certain weapons.

  • Laurie –  Her daughter was killed by someone with a gun that she says had a “high-capacity” magazine. We know Democrats like to twist words so that they fit a given agenda, such as calling the Fort Hood Massacre a “workplace shooting” or renaming “gun control” legislation “gun safety” legislation. Based on this and comments from earlier in the gun grab festival, we don’t know if she was referring to a 33-round magazine, 16-round, or even a 10-round magazine. She used the term “high capacity magazine” on purpose. Furthermore, she failed to specify if the gun was an assault rifle. My guess is that she did not, because it was not.
  • Pam & Bruce – staffers for Gabby Giffords, one was shot in chest. They failed to mention that Giffords and the others were shot with a Glock 19 handgun. It had a high capacity 33-round magazine, but it was still a handgun.
  • Collin – VA Tech shooting survivor, shot four times.
  • Omar – His sister was killed at VA Tech.
  • Lilly – Was shot at VA Tech, mentioned a call for “gun safety” legislation.
  • Umalu – Her father was killed at VA Tech.
  • I would like to point out that the VA Tech shooter used a Glock 19 with standard 10-round magazines. The gun was legally purchased despite his massive mental history record. The law prevented his mental history from being included as part of the background check process.
  • Maya – Her Father was killed in Minneapolis workplace shooting – Gun not specified.
  • Unnmaned gentleman – Referred to Thousand Oaks, CA where his parents were killed as “Americas safest city”. The gun used in the murder was not specified, and I find it intensely ironic that the final victim in Feinstein’s pity party parade actually mocked the strength of the gun laws in that city. His final statement basically said “GUN LAWS DON’T WORK, IF THEY DID MY PARENTS WOULD STILL BE ALIVE.”

Please note that I am in no way trying to belittle their suffering or their losses. But none of the new legislation being proposed by this panel would have prevented any of the crimes listed above. Yet Feinstein (someone who once admitted how safe she felt carrying her own gun), felt compelled to use these people as pawns in her disgusting game.

Unlke many of my liberal counterparts, I welcome the chance to be corrected, so hit me up on Twitter @Loud_Talker or use the contact form on the About Me page to send me your opinion. Every death is tragic, but gun laws are as effective as prohibition was and as immigration laws are today. I am for improving the background check process in a rational manner based on technology. I am for reasonable waiting periods. But I am not for confiscation, mandatory registration, or background checks on ammunition purposes. Why should I be allowed to have an AR-15? Because I can. In America you do not have the right to not be offended. If you want to DEBATE the topic, let’s do it Congress. But I refuse to sit around and listen to a bunch of Democrats tell me how it is going to be. We get that enough from our president, I expect better from the rest of our representatives.

Racist Keith Ellison (D-MN) Wants To Cut HUD And Green Investing!

Last week Kieth Ellison (D-MN) appeared on The Young Turks show (Al Jazeera Current TV) to talk about budget cuts. Here’s one of the things he had to say:

“…eliminating oil, gas and coal tax breaks and subsidies would leave “another $100 billion” in government coffers.” Then he added, “My point is, if Republicans want to do cuts, we should do cuts, but we’re not going to hurt America’s working class and poor to do it.”

According to the Cato Institute, the 2012 budget included about $97B in funding that is categorizes as “corporate welfare.” When you look at the report (something that Ellison and his supporters failed to do), you learn that there are lots of different categories. For example, of the $97B in the Cato report, $17B falls under the category of Dept. of Energy. Of that, almost $10B is for “Energy Supply and Conservation.”

Keith Ellison Wants To Cut Conservation Funding!

Another example: The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and the Minority Business Development Agency are considered corporate welfare.

Keith Ellison Is A Racist, Wants to CUT Spending For Minorities!

What about green investment? Corporate welfare also includes the Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing Loan program.

Keith Ellison Wants To Cut Green Jobs/Investments!

Seriously… this is how the headlines would appear if any Republican even hinted at cutting government programs that touched minorities or the environment. Just look at the comments under the article I linked above to find examples of how utterly clueless many Americas are when it comes to facts and tax revenue.

Remember, emotion is the enemy of critical thought. Ellison’s emotional claim that we can cut $100B by cutting off evil energy companies is patently false. Liar, liar pants on fire false. America faces dark times, the last thing we want to be doing is promoting lies and distorting the truth.

President Obama’s Top 46 Gaffes of 2012

Ed Morrissey is one of the most respected and well-read conservative bloggers out there. I’m happy to call him a friend and always look forward to chatting with him those few times we cross paths at an evil conservative get-together. For four years he has been running a daily post over at Hotair.com called the “Obamateurism of the Day.” It was a one-term deal (just like our president should have been), I’m happy to post the finalists for the Obamateurism of the year.

Remember, every day for the past four years Ed has posted an Obama screw up, administration guffaw, or public facing White House blunder. We’re talking more than a thousand now. Of course, members of the press have been too busy swooning over their Obama posters or sending their lemmings out to dig up dirt on conservatives when they’ve had a legitimate goldmine of newsworthy red meat staring them in the face. But as often is the case, the abused don’t recognize their abuser.

The following list is a collection of the top gaffes from 2012. It’s not a complete list, there are almost three hundred more I could have posted. for this year alone. I’ve posted them in no particular order, and each link takes to you a source article for more information. Just imagine if the press spent as much time doing its job as Ed has done doing his.

  1. “He didn’t want to take pictures with any more soldiers; he was complaining about it
  2. Shuts down Disney World in order to promote tourism
  3. Hails Roe decision as essential to allow “our daughters … to fulfill their dreams
  4. Finds claim of unemployment “ interesting” because he is getting “the word” that woman’s husband should have no trouble finding work
  5. Says “when the chips are down, I have Israel’s back,” WH claims it’s not a military doctrine
  6. Claims that his apology to Karzai “calmed things down“ in the Middle Easts
  7. Uses Boeing plant in SC to cheer manufacturing after his National Labor Review Board tried to shut it down
  8. The man proudly opposed of signing statements issues one covering 17 provisions of bill he signed
  9. Emphasizes graduation rates in the State of the Union address, but cuts DC school voucher program that nearly doubled grad rates
  10. “Well, it turns out our Founders designed a system that makes it more difficult to bring about change that I would like sometimes.” Imagine that.
  11. Gets annoyed when asked about number of vacations, doesn’t answer question
  12. “I’m confident that the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically elected Congress.”
  13. Tells Russian leader “This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility.”
  14. Blames Fox News for his unpopularity because “they hear Obama is a Muslim 24/7, and it begins to seep in” Thin skin much? 
  15. Attacks Limbaugh while remaining silent on Maher contribution to his super-PAC
  16. “[T]hose of us who have spent time in the real world . . .”
  17. Adds himself into presidential histories of his predecessors, screws up JFK quote
  18. “When I think about, ah, those soldiers or airmen or Marines, sailors, who are out there fighting on my behalf …”
  19. Includes Nazi collaborator/Hitler admirer in proclamation for Jewish American Heritage Month
  20. Obama’s griped that the American public just did not appreciate their exceptional leader
  21. Removing silverware from tables before speaking to Hispanic voters. I guess he was afraid they might cut him?
  22. Scolds American Crossroads for lack of transparency … on same day Obama asserted executive privilege in Fast & Furious probe
  23. “The private sector is doing fine
  24. Declares Lech Walesa “too political” to accept award, gives another to Dolores Huerta, chair of Democratic Socialists of America. Freedom too political, Socialism just dandy.
  25. Polish death camp
  26. “Because we’re leading around the world, people have a new attitude toward America. There’s more confidence in our leadership. We see it everywhere we go.”
  27. “Just like we’ve tried their plan, we tried our plan — and it worked.”  Um. Define “worked” please.
  28. “If you’ve got a business, you didn’t build that. Somebody else made that happen.” Full context doesn’t make it any more palatable.
  29. “But the nature of this office is also to tell a story to the American people…”
  30. Pitches amnesty policy at naturalization ceremony of people who entered legally
  31. Ordering platform change after criticism over God, Jerusalem
  32. Sends form letters to families of SEALs killed in action, yet fins time to send a personal letter to family of rapper Heavy D
  33. “I don’t think you or anybody who’s been watching the campaign would say that in any way we have tried to divide the country.”
  34. Hiding from WH press corps while giving interviews to People and Entertainment Tonight
  35. Asks supporters to find businesses to support his “you didn’t build that” argument
  36. “Jim, you may want to move on to another topic.” In other words, don’t dare ruffle the feathers of the great one.
  37. Scolds Congress for campaigning instead of addressing issues – after he campaigned while embassies burned
  38. “The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.” In the mean time, Catholics are forced to go against their beliefs.
  39. Goes to Las Vegas fundraiser after attack on Benghazi consulate
  40. No time to meet with Netanyahu, makes time for the Pimp with a Limp radio show. Seriously? How is that acceptable?
  41. “If four Americans get killed, it’s not optimal.” I guess that’s one way to describe the death of an ambassador and three soldiers that was then covered up and intentionally distorted by his administration.
  42. Refuses to talk to reporters about Benghazi, but grants interview to Us Magazine
  43. Tells rally that they have a tough choice to make “in four days” … three days before the election
  44. Spends Election Day playing basketball rather than working on Hurricane Sandy relief. I bet those New Yorkers are blaming GW Bush for their suffering.
  45. Tries to kiss Burmese political leader Aung Sang Suu Kyi, in yet another example of just how clueless this administration is when it comes to understanding political protocol and etiquette.
  46. Gives eulogy for Daniel Inouye, but actually spends his time talking mostly about himself

Head on over to HotAir if you want to see which Obamateurisms made it to the finals, and which one won.

Obama’s “Tax The Rich” Diet Plan

Sign me up for this!

The basic premise of President Obama’s 2012 campaign was a tax the rich, make them pay their fair share argument. And now Obama and Speaker Boehner are having lots of closed door meetings (where is the transparency?) to work out a “deal” on taxes.

Allow me to cut to the chase. Let the president have his tax cuts. Don’t ask for anything. Let him raise the rates on the wealthy from 35% to 39%. Let the Bush tax cuts expire. Why? Because doing so won’t help our economy one bit, nor will it help our deficit or the unemployment rate. Doing so won’t stop food prices from rising, or housing values from falling.

But it will kick millions of Americans right in their wallets. And this is the only thing that matters to most Americans.

It has been widely publicized that allowing the tax rate to rise on the rich will generate $824 billion in savings over ten years. Ignoring for a moment that this amount is less than a single year of Obama deficits, the CBO estimates that the first year of tax savings will be $42 billion.  How much is that? What portion of Obama’s budget is that exactly? It amounts to 1.1%. To put this in terms most of us can easily understand, take a look at the following image.

tax_burger Our budget needs a diet, and the president thinks he has the answer. His “tax the rich” diet is the mathematical equivalent of removing three french fries from your every day Big Mac medium combo. Three fries. If you throw in the caloric impact of letting the Bush tax cuts expire on the middle class, you go right ahead and take out another ten fries. Wow! Eat your heart out Richard Simmons!

Do you like pizza? This Obama diet is awesome. By taxing the rich you can take off 1/8 of a slice of pepperoni. Not 1/8 of the whole slice of pizza, just 1/8 of one of one individual pepperoni slice. The Bush tax cuts ending for the middle class? Take of an entire half of a slice of pepperoni meat. tax_pizza

If you want to think in terms of beer, the Obama Tax The Rich  and Stop Drinking Program equates to no more than the spittle at the bottom of the cans in that six pack you just finished. Letting the Bush tax cuts expire on millions of middle class Americans equates to filling up a shot glass with beer and then drinking the rest of the six pack. ::burp:: Yee haw!

Taxing the rich more serves no purpose other than to appease people that have no idea how our economy work or how jobs are created. It embodies the president’s class warfare “spread the wealth around” mindset that sounds great in liberal college classrooms or in community organizer meetings. It is not based on anything close to reality, and the president’s plan will do nothing to help our nation. So let him have it. Sure, some of us will pay more now. But maybe this is the kick in the pants that millions of Americans need to wake the heck up and become more involved and aware about our political environment.

Bon appetit!

Let Teachers Carry

After 9/11 there was a push to allow airline pilots to carry weapons to protect themselves. This was based on the idea that there are times when bad people get into restricted areas and needed to be dealt with via lethal force. Classrooms are no different, in my opinion.

Before you freak out, I’m not talking about the open carrying of weapons in schools. My suggestion is that teachers should be able to have weapons in their classrooms and in offices that are securely locked with limited access. If an event were to happen, teachers could get to their weapons and help to diffuse a situation and minimize casualties. And perhaps twisted people would think twice about entering a school if they knew that they might meet resistance.

There is merit to the idea of adding armed security guards in every school in America. I’m not talking mall cops or parking lot security, I’m talking truly trained, well researched candidates. Think of how many retired military veterans and police officers might sign up. Think of how many parents might become more involved if they could serve in a security rotation. It’s not a perfect idea, but it is worth discussing.

The only problem with using security guards is that the bad guys will know what they look like and where they are. However, we can counter that by throwing in an element of surprise. What if teachers could volunteer to add “security team” to their job description? Require them to pass current state concealed carry laws and then have them go through more specific training that covers scenarios like we have seen in Columbine, VA Tech and now Newtown. Then give the teachers a significant bonus each semester for taking on this added responsibility.

Guns would be owned by the teachers, and they would be stored in their classrooms in locked gun safes in their desks or closets. This would prevent students from gaining access while keeping the weapons easily accessible when needed.

Opponents will say that we don’t need guns in schools. They will say that children don’t need to see this imagery (while at the same time they let their young kids play violent games targeted at teens and adults). They will say America is better than that. Maybe 50 years ago that was true, but Newtown is just another example of a disaster that could have been prevented. It is another example of how gun-free zones are the same as penning up pigs before a slaughter. It is a one-sided situation and we need to turn the tables.