Two words: Hell no.
I know, I know. I’m in the minorty among my conservative friends but hear me out. Michael Steele is a modest Republican version of Joe Biden, with an equally charming smile plus the un-Biden-like trait of being man enough to embrace his own baldness.
What will happen if Michael Steele steps down or is somehow forcibly removed? The left will swarm like kids around the ice cream man and the complicit press will force feed the news to Americans from every channel ad nauseum.
What would happen if Michael Steele stays put, as I think he should? The press will swarm like kids around the ice cream man and the complicit press will force feed the news to Americans from every channel ad nauseum.
So why give the left another grave to dance over? The left will do what it does regardless of what Mr. Steele decides to do. Remember, Steele’s term ends in January, 2011. Why not focus on important things like winning local elections and generating conservative voter activity in November? Sure, what Mr. Steele said about Afghanistan didn’t make sense. I think he misspoke, the same way that Al Gore misspoke about inventing the internet.
Is Steele right that a land war in Afghanistan is a bad idea? Why not ask Russia for the answer.
Is he right that this war is of Obama’s choosing? Yes and no. We all know the war started nine years ago, so it is obviously not of Obama’s creation. But it is the war that Obama has repeatedly expressed support for. I think it is his war, just not of his making.
Does his statement merit loss of his job? Again I say hell no. If politicians lost their jobs over erroneous or questionable statements they made during various gatherings the House, Senate and White House would be empty. But if you think he should step down, I suggest you ask President Obama step down for any of the dozens of verbal and factual, um, “gaffes” he has made. Given that Steele was speaking at a fund raiser, let’s just pull one Obama gaffe out of the air for comparison. It had to do with people clinging to their guns and their religion. One man was asked to resign, the other was elected president.
When you convince me of the logic of those outcomes I might consider joining the emotional “fire Steele” bandwagon. I just think we need to focus on the bigger picture: We have a country to save.
If president Obama removes General Stanley McChrystal from his role as leader of our efforts in Afghanistan, it will be the first time an active duty general has been removed from leading his troops during a war since Macarthur was relieved in Korean War. Given that perspective, you would think that McChrystal did something really bad.
::crickets::
I think those that condemn the general are failing to “read the bill” again. I think our president may be acting stupidly (again). As I type this General Stanley McChrystal is rumored to have submitted his resignation to the president. Say it ain’t so Stan.
- Sen. John Thune, R-SD, said, “Things that were said in the article…were inappropriate. They’re inconsistent with the protocol and the chain of command in the military.”
- Committee Chairman Carl Levin, D-MI, said he is “very troubled by (McChrystal’s) comments.”
- Senate Intelligence Committee Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein, D-FL, said questions about McChrystal’s future are “above my pay grade.”
- Republican John McCain of Arizona, Joe Lieberman, I-CT, and Lindsey Graham, R-SC: “We have the highest respect for General McChrystal and honor his brave service and sacrifice to our nation. General McChrystal’s comments, as reported in Rolling Stone, are inappropriate and inconsistent with the traditional relationship between Commander-in-Chief and the military.”
I’ve read the entire Rolling Stone article that has Washington all in a tizzy. Personally I think Rolling Stone contains a lot of crap intended for today’s MTV reality television audience. It would be refreshing to read an article that doesn’t have an f-bomb in every paragraph, although I agree with the following excerpt:
“When it comes to Afghanistan, history is not on McChrystal’s side. The only foreign invader to have any success here was Genghis Khan – and he wasn’t hampered by things like human rights, economic development and press scrutiny.”
To save you some time I’ve captured every single quote attributed directly to General McChrystal and listed them below. The most shocking statements that I’m seeing repeated in the press come from aides or other military personnel, not General McCrystal. After you read the list, please let me know which of the quotes below merits removing a sitting general from his leadership role in the middle of a war.
I think McChrystal’s biggest mistake was agreeing to let Rolling Stone shadow him and write a story in the first place. What was he thinking? Was he taking a cue from the rock star president that he voted for and that gave him his job in the first place? Washington Post columnist Jackson Diehl wrote, “McChrystal may be at fault for expressing his frustrations to Rolling Stone. He is not at fault for the lack of coherence in the Afghan campaign or the continued feuding over strategy. That is Obama’s responsibility.”
I am against removing General McChrystal and I hope that he does not resign. One of the many articles I’ve read about this suggested that it would be a win-win for Obama to reject the generals resignation letter. I can easily see that happening. After all, Obama is a politician, not a leader. As Ed Morrissey sums up nicely: “…until [Obama] starts acting like an actual Commander in Chief with his own team, McChrystal isn’t the real problem.”
Here is the list of McChrystal quotes. Judge for yourself and let me know if any of the statements below are worthy of taking down a general.McChrystal Quotes from the Rolling Stone Article:
- ‘How’d I get screwed into going to this dinner?”
- “Hey, Charlie,” he asks, “does this come with the position?”
- “What’s the update on the Kandahar bombing?”
- “I’d rather have my ass kicked by a roomful of people than go out to this dinner. Unfortunately no one in this room could do it.”
- “shortsighted,” “Chaos-istan.”
- “I never know what’s going to pop out until I’m up there, that’s the problem.” “Are you asking about Vice President Biden?” “Who’s that?”
- After arriving in Afghanistan last June, the general conducted his own policy review, ordered up by Defense Secretary Robert Gates. The now-infamous report was leaked to the press, and its conclusion was dire: If we didn’t send another 40,000 troops – swelling the number of U.S. forces in Afghanistan by nearly half – we were in danger of “mission failure.”
- Obama launched a three-month review to re-evaluate the strategy in Afghanistan. “I found that time painful,” McChrystal tells me in one of several lengthy interviews. “I was selling an unsellable position.”
- The biggest military operation of the year – a ferocious offensive that began in February to retake the southern town of Marja – continues to drag on, prompting McChrystal himself to refer to it as a “bleeding ulcer.”
- “All these men,” he tells me. “I’d die for them. And they’d die for me.”
- “Oh, not another e-mail from Holbrooke,” he groans. “I don’t even want to open it.”
- McChrystal and his team were blindsided by the cable. “I like Karl, I’ve known him for years, but they’d never said anything like that to us before,” says McChrystal, who adds that he felt “betrayed” by the leak. “Here’s one that covers his flank for the history books. Now if we fail, they can say, ‘I told you so.’ ”
- Stanley McChrystal entered an Army that was all but broken in the wake of Vietnam. “We really felt we were a peacetime generation,” he recalls. “There was the Gulf War, but even that didn’t feel like that big of a deal.”
- 2004 “If the circumstances of Corporal Tillman’s death become public,” he wrote, it could cause “public embarrassment” for the president.
- “I’m saddened by the accusation that I don’t care about soldiers, as it is something I suspect any soldier takes both personally and professionally – at least I do. But I know perceptions depend upon your perspective at the time, and I respect that every soldier’s view is his own.”
- The general has a 45-minute discussion with some two dozen soldiers. The atmosphere is tense. “I ask you what’s going on in your world, and I think it’s important for you all to understand the big picture as well,” McChrystal begins. “How’s the company doing? You guys feeling sorry for yourselves? Anybody? Anybody feel like you’re losing?”
- “Strength is leading when you just don’t want to lead,” he tells the men. “You’re leading by example. That’s what we do. Particularly when it’s really, really hard, and it hurts inside.”
- “We are knee-deep in the decisive year.” “This is the philosophical part that works with think tanks,” McChrystal tries to joke. “But it doesn’t get the same reception from infantry companies.”
- “Winning hearts and minds in COIN is a coldblooded thing. The Russians killed 1 million Afghans, and that didn’t work.”
- “I agree with you. In this area, we’ve not made progress, probably. You have to show strength here, you have to use fire. What I’m telling you is, fire costs you. What do you want to do? You want to wipe the population out here and resettle it?”
- “That’s the way this game is,” “It’s complex. I can’t just decide: It’s shirts and skins, and we’ll kill all the shirts.”
- “There’s no way I can make that easier,” he tells them. “No way I can pretend it won’t hurt. No way I can tell you not to feel that… I will tell you, you’re doing a great job. Don’t let the frustration get to you.”
- “Even Afghans are confused by Afghanistan.”
Maybe it’s just me, but I see nothing wrong with the quotes above.
See. I’m not an anti-American Democrat hater. I love America and want it to succeed. Here’s an example where I completely agree with Joe Biden, and I’m not being sarcastic.
Joe Biden had a question. During a long Sunday meeting with President Obama and top national-security advisers on Sept. 13, the VP interjected,
“Can I just clarify a factual point? How much will we spend this year on Afghanistan?” Someone provided the figure: $65 billion.
“And how much will we spend on Pakistan?” Another figure was supplied: $2.25 billion.
“Well, by my calculations that’s a 30-to-1 ratio in favor of Afghanistan. So I have a question. Al Qaeda is almost all in Pakistan, and Pakistan has nuclear weapons. And yet for every dollar we’re spending in Pakistan, we’re spending $30 in Afghanistan. Does that make strategic sense?”
The White House Situation Room fell silent. But the questions had their desired effect: those gathered began putting more thought into Pakistan as the key theater in the region.
If this Joe Biden was present during the election I think more Americans would have confidence in him. After all, wasn’t he selected to add international experience to the Obama ticket, to shore up a gap in Obama’s resume? Violence is increasing, troop fatalities are increasing, and the enemy is much more confident than it was while George W. Bush was in charge. Could it be because our president is clueless and hesitant when it comes to military affairs? I hope he listens to Joe on this one.